• Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
Top Stocks Insider
  • News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Stock
No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Stock
No Result
View All Result
Top Stocks Insider
No Result
View All Result
Home Investing

Postal Service Metrics

by
April 8, 2025
in Investing
0
Postal Service Metrics
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Chris Edwards

Commenting on possible US Postal Service (USPS) privatization a few months ago, President Donald Trump said, “it’s an idea that a lot of people have liked for a long time.” Indeed, they have. Cato has been making the case for privatization since the 1980s. Then with the rise of the internet in the 1990s, it became even more clear that a government-owned paper-delivery system was not needed.

In 2002, the Congressional Research Service (CRS) noted that Ruth Goldway of the Postal Rate Commission had

proposed privatizing USPS through an initial public stock offering that might bring as much as $100 billion to the Treasury … Privatization, she believes, is “the best way to save the institution from oblivion” as financial correspondence increasingly moves on-line.

The CRS also noted at the time that Postmaster General William Henderson

in his final interviews and public appearances, said that privatization has been adopted by much of the rest of the world and is inevitable here, as well. Shortly after leaving office, he explicitly endorsed privatizing USPS through an employee stock option plan.

Two decades later, the case for privatization is even stronger. The USPS has lost billions of dollars over the years, and the volume of mail continues to fall. Privatization would allow the USPS to cut costs, innovate, and find new markets.

We put together this table showing changes in USPS operations since 2000.

The data indicate that since the turn of the century:

The volume of first-class mail, marketing mail, and periodicals has fallen continuously.
Marketing mail—“junk mail”—has become the largest type of mail by volume.
Post office visits are down by half since 2000 even though the US population has increased 21 percent since then.
Despite the huge drop in visits, the number of post offices has been cut just 8 percent since 2000. Many post offices today get little traffic, with the average location receiving just 9 visits per hour—calculated by roughly assuming 2,500 hours per location per year.
USPS management has cut the number of employees 29 percent since 2000, but total product volume is down 46 percent.
Almost three-quarters of USPS costs are employee compensation. About four-fifths of the labor force is unionized.
Operating expenses are higher than operating revenues.
The USPS is a sharply declining part of the US economy.

Some cost-cutting approaches seem obvious. How about closing thousands of little-used retail post offices and those close to other locations? How about moving to three-day-a-week delivery (rather than six) to cut the USPS’s massive vehicle fleet? Such changes would save money and benefit the environment.

However, such reforms are difficult to make with the USPS in government hands. As Cato has long suggested, the best solution is privatization.

More on USPS reform here, here, here, here, and here.

Table compiled by the author based on data in USPS financial statements here, here, here, and here.

Yasmeen Kallash-Kyler helped research the article.

Previous Post

The Senate Plan Is a Trap—House Lawmakers Shouldn’t Fall for It

Next Post

The Journal of Prices and Markets

Next Post

The Journal of Prices and Markets

    Fill Out & Get More Relevant News


    Stay ahead of the market and unlock exclusive trading insights & timely news. We value your privacy - your information is secure, and you can unsubscribe anytime. Gain an edge with hand-picked trading opportunities, stay informed with market-moving updates, and learn from expert tips & strategies.

    Disclaimer: TopStocksInsider.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively "The Company") do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Copyright © 2024 TopStocksInsider. All Rights Reserved.

    No Result
    View All Result
    • News
    • Economy
    • Editor’s Pick
    • Investing
    • Stock

    Copyright © 2024 TopStocksInsider. All Rights Reserved.