• Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
Top Stocks Insider
  • News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Stock
No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Stock
No Result
View All Result
Top Stocks Insider
No Result
View All Result
Home Investing

To Eliminate Underground Markets, Tax and Regulate Less

by
May 22, 2024
in Investing
0
To Eliminate Underground Markets, Tax and Regulate Less
0
SHARES
8
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Jeffrey Miron

The state of New York legalized recreational marijuana in 2021. Recent estimates, however, count 2,000 unlicensed vendors and only 100 licensed ones. 

Why did legalization not eliminate the underground market? 

One problem is that New York’s policy change did not eliminate the federal ban on marijuana, which has two important consequences. State‐​legalized marijuana sellers cannot access the federally regulated banking system, and such sellers cannot deduct from revenue the costs of producing a federally illegal product. Thus, even without state prohibition, marijuana sellers face strong incentives to remain underground.

A second impediment is that New York has been slow at licensing legal marijuana retailers, with 30 people assigned to review about 7,000 applications. Additionally, a dispensary license in New York costs $7,000, plus $4,500 for a cannabis delivery license. 

The third factor is the state’s 13 percent tax on retail sales, which again advantages black market sales. 

To address this issue, Gov. Kathy Hochul announced an overhaul of New York’s legal cannabis program, granting authorities the power to speed up licensing and shut down local marijuana vendors. Faster licensing makes sense; shutting down underground vendors does not.

Instead, policy should allow the entire market to move above ground by reducing costly and time‐​consuming regulation. These include requirements on environmental impact, store security, and record‐​keeping, among others. By so doing, while expanding licensing and lowering the tax rate, the state can move most of the market above ground. This will plausibly raise tax revenue, by applying a lower rate to a much larger base.

Previous Post

Industrial Policy Is Back—and It’s a Gigantic Mistake

Next Post

Higher Education Too Often Values Second-Rate Economics Research over Teaching

Next Post

Higher Education Too Often Values Second-Rate Economics Research over Teaching

    Fill Out & Get More Relevant News


    Stay ahead of the market and unlock exclusive trading insights & timely news. We value your privacy - your information is secure, and you can unsubscribe anytime. Gain an edge with hand-picked trading opportunities, stay informed with market-moving updates, and learn from expert tips & strategies.

    Disclaimer: TopStocksInsider.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively "The Company") do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Copyright © 2024 TopStocksInsider. All Rights Reserved.

    No Result
    View All Result
    • News
    • Economy
    • Editor’s Pick
    • Investing
    • Stock

    Copyright © 2024 TopStocksInsider. All Rights Reserved.