• About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
Top Stocks Insider
  • News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Stock
No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Stock
No Result
View All Result
Top Stocks Insider
No Result
View All Result
Home Economy

Jack Knetsch: 1933-2022

by
February 6, 2023
in Economy
0
0
SHARES
5
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

I just learned that Jack Knetsch died back in August. Here is the obituary from Simon Fraser University:

Jack was a Professor in SFU’s Economics Department and the School of Resource and Environmental Management from 1974 to 1998, at which time he transitioned to Professor Emeritus. Jack received his PhD from Harvard University and worked at Resources for the Future in Washington, DC, before coming to SFU.

Jack was an excellent teacher, mentor and colleague, but he especially made his mark through contributions to leading economics research. With co-authors like Daniel Kahneman, Jack’s experimental research challenged some of the key underlying assumptions of neoclassical economics, with significant implications for the methods used to estimate the monetary value of environmental losses. He had over 200 publications, with many of these in the top economics journals. And some of his collaborators (Kahneman, Thaler) were eventually recognized with the Nobel Prize for the innovative research path to which Jack contributed.

Here is a link to a 1968 book review of the Clawson and Knetsch’s 1966 Economics of Outdoor Recreation: Review of Clawson and Knetsch Economics of Outdoor Recreation (PDF). Hotelling is credited with the suggestion for the travel cost method but it was Clawson and Knetsch (1966) who figured out how to do it. 

He was still conducting research in his late 80s. Here is the Google Scholar page for publications since 2019: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?as_ylo=2019&q=jack+knetsch&hl=en&as_sdt=0,34.

Previous Post

Yes, the Minimum Wage Harms the Economy

Next Post

Ummm, @PeterGleick, I addressed this 5,958 days ago: Free markets are, in fact, not free

Next Post
Ummm, @PeterGleick, I addressed this 5,958 days ago: Free markets are, in fact, not free

Ummm, @PeterGleick, I addressed this 5,958 days ago: Free markets are, in fact, not free

    Sign up for our newsletter to receive the latest insights, updates, and exclusive content straight to your inbox! Whether it's industry news, expert advice, or inspiring stories, we bring you valuable information that you won't find anywhere else. Stay connected with us!


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Disclaimer: TopStocksInsider.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively "The Company") do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Copyright © 2025 topstocksinsider.com | All Rights Reserved

    No Result
    View All Result
    • News
    • Economy
    • Editor’s Pick
    • Investing
    • Stock

    Copyright © 2025 topstocksinsider.com | All Rights Reserved